Friday, September 22, 2023

Microsoft, Activision CEOs expected to urge US judge to allow $69 billion merger

Must read

FEMA flood insurance program faces dual existential threats

The National Flood Insurance Program is up against another deadline for renewal while a lawsuit from 10 states takes aim at its...

Plunk to punch up marketing for Union Street Media, Realforce

Data from artificial intelligence-powered valuation company Plunk will be used to enrich the products of two real estate industry firms that specialize...

Surprisingly strong jobs report sends interest rates soaring

No one can predict the future of real estate, but you can prepare. Find out what to prepare for and pick...

Existing-home sales fall off 0.7% led by Southern, Western markets

Sales of existing homes slid 0.7 percent between July and August to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.04 million but held...

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – With U.S. antitrust enforcers determined to stop Microsoft from buying “Call of Duty” maker Activision Blizzard, the companies’ two chief executives are expected to testify on Wednesday that the $69 billion deal will be good for gamers and should go forward.

The Federal Trade Commission has asked a judge to stop the transaction temporarily in order to allow the agency’s in-house judge to decide the case. In the past, the side that lost in federal court often conceded and the in-house process was scrapped.

Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick is expected to testify on Wednesday morning, followed by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella in the afternoon.

The case, which is being heard in federal court in San Francisco, will be decided by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley.

The FTC says the transaction would give Microsoft exclusive access to Activision games, leaving Nintendo and Sony Group out in the cold.

To address antitrust concerns, Microsoft has offered to license the blockbuster “Call of Duty” to rivals.

Microsoft has argued that it is better off financially by licensing the games to all comers.

The deal has won approval from many jurisdictions but has been opposed by the FTC in the United States and Britain’s Competition and Markets Authority.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz in Washington and Greg Bensinger in San Francisco; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

More articles

Latest article

FEMA flood insurance program faces dual existential threats

The National Flood Insurance Program is up against another deadline for renewal while a lawsuit from 10 states takes aim at its...

Plunk to punch up marketing for Union Street Media, Realforce

Data from artificial intelligence-powered valuation company Plunk will be used to enrich the products of two real estate industry firms that specialize...

Surprisingly strong jobs report sends interest rates soaring

No one can predict the future of real estate, but you can prepare. Find out what to prepare for and pick...

Existing-home sales fall off 0.7% led by Southern, Western markets

Sales of existing homes slid 0.7 percent between July and August to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.04 million but held...